Monthly Archives: October 2020

An American Kidnapping

By Connie Reguli.

www.facebook.com/connie.reguli/videos/3475507782507791/

My country, AMERICA, BE VERY ASHAMED!!!!!!!

#TenneseeLastNight Oct. 6, 2020

#ImproperEndangermentDoctrineApplied

#KIDNAP

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=3476520862406483&id=100001458094906&sfnsn=mo&extid=eCaStKS4c8j3nscG&d=n&vh=i

* Police detained parents for hours with no probable cause and no removal Order on hand; that detainment is Unconstitutional restraint of liberty. This happened to me in my case by city and county officers (in NC).

* Social worker shows up not knowing any details to the case. Same happened to me in NC.

*All government agents saying they are “just doing their job” or “what they were told”, which are grounds for an enabling type of doctrine in Federal civil suits. Same in my case in NC.

* They already investigated the parents for saftey factors, risk factors, exigent circumstances, and min. parent standards for this child and found nothing. They never even bothered to investigate in my case in NC or assess. No substantiation means they still have a Constitutionally-protected bubble of the right to privacy regarding this child. Obviously government agents involved in their case and mine don’t care about the Constitution. Gross negligence claims in civil suits cover the county’s excessive lack of concern in properly educating their SW (cheaper to have uneducated unlicensed ones).

*Without exigent circumstances, you cannot just take a child or something from a person to whom that child or something belongs where CRIME is committed. No crime had been commited, the police were just used as thugs with guns to steal and kidnap a child without a LAWFUL Order for removal. LAWFUL means FACTS – that paper the social worker improperly SERVED to the parents wasn’t factual. You see from the video and pics she never gave the papers to the police to serve? You have to have a PROPER investigation to discern FACTS and a social worker who isn’t taught to lie to CREATE “facts”. There were no exigent circumstances here, like there were none in my case.That would be a 4th Amendment violation. On top of due process littered everywhere in this case. Oh, I wasn’t ever properly served and they lied about who served me in court.

*The ‘endangerment doctrine’ means that if one child IN THE HOME experienced a certain kind of abuse, other children are looked at and assessed if THEY will be endangered by the SAME alleged abuse. If yes, the abuse applies to the other child, RISK and SAFTEY factors must apply in a PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR not single incident for a child to be removed on a “possible abuse in the future”, that parent and child has a right to privacy if the alleged abuse doesn’t apply to the other child(ren). They took this month old baby on improper endangerment doctrine, as they took my daughter on improper endangerment doctrine because my daughter was not school-aged.

Lastly, that SW didn’t know how to properly buckle in an infant in a proper car seat and refused to let the mother do so. Officers refused to help the SW who was making a once calm babe in her mother’s arms begin screaming and crying once separated from her mother.