We are moving into our 19th month of the official declaration of a pandemic. I was in Washington DC on March 12, 2020 in a citizens lobbying project when we were told all Federal Buildings open to the public were shutting down. When I returned in August 2020 with a small group of citizen lobbyists, thinking that the public offices of the senators and congressmen would now be open, I was shocked to now find buildings all along avenues around the Federal block were not only closed but boarded up. Closed. Closed. Closed.
I went to Washington DC in September, October, November, and December in 2020. On each trip the sights of DC was more and more depressing. Plywood, fencing, police, sirens, flocks of violent ANTIFA…. It reached its peak in January when I retired for the Jan 6 rally. By early morning on Jan 7 an eight foot fence was erected around the Capitol.
As citizens who cared about freedom, we were shocked and dismayed at where we were. Surviving the pandemic was only part of our struggles for Americans. Now our freedoms were at risk.
But now let’s talk about the economy and the pandemic.
First unemployment. President Trump supporters watched the unemployment rates dropped systematically during his tenure. In February 2020, unemployment rates were at a historic low of 3.5%. As soon as the country was shut down by governors all over the US, unemployment shot up to 14.4%.
In response the the massive shut down, Congress passed the first economic relief package. Now, do not forget that is you tax dollars. this included a massive distribution for unemployment benefits and the PPP (payroll protection plan) to businesses to keep employees on the payroll even though they did not have the revenue to support the payroll. (A basic business economic principle.)
A second waive of unemployment and PPP occurred in early 2021. The total push of tax dollars into the day to day economy exploded.
The gross national product (GNP), which has exponentially grown over the last century took a dive in The last quarter of 2020 which means the commercial goods and services crashed when businesses were shut down.
If you are putting this together in you head, you can see that the recovery of the economic measures was due in large part to pushing tax dollars back into the economy and NOT due to an increases in market transactions.
Now, let’s move on. What you need to also see is that the stock market has also soared while the everyday working class has suffered from loss of employment.
I am assuming that you are not a sophisticated economist and neither am I, but I want you to see a bit of what is happening.
Just a month ago, Frontline published a four part series on Wall Street, debt, banking, and the Fed. If you want to increase you understand this better watch these.
Part One Money Power and Wall Street. President Clinton and deregulation.
Part Two The fall of Bear Stearnes and Ben Bernanke, Chair of the Fed (2006-2014). The bailout. President Obama’s Cooper Union speech. The fall of Lehman Bros. The taxpayer bailout of AIG insurance costing taxpayers $180 billion. Then in 2008, $700 billion of tax dollars were handed to Sec of treasury Paulson for TARP. The US government became an investor in the banks.
Part Three President Obama’s honeymoon with Wall Street.
As you watch these you will see that high roller bankers and brokers trade “a hope and a prayer” and NOT real economic growth.
Before President Clinton left office he deregulated banking allowing them to join brokerage firms or start their own brokerage activities. That moved bankers (generally believed to be conservative secure institutions) into the area of high risk stock trading.
Derivatives, sub-prime loans, financial shell games, credit default swaps, CDOs, TARP, moral hazard, traunching, … all words to add to your vocabulary to understand the financial world. It is not about dollars 💵 and cents, but about paper 📑 transactions with little relationship to industrial 🏭 growth or goods and services.
The result was a housing crises of 2008 in which we saw mortgage defaults by the thousands leaving homes abandoned and the populace crushed financially. Any small amount of equity they accumulated was gone. Sub-prime mortgages became toxic “assets”. The market stopped trading the mortgages that had been packaged in bundles. These mortgages were made to people who could not pay, based on inflated housing values, and high interest rates.
You will see that The Fed (the Federal Reserve Bank) creates money, erases debt, and manipulates the economy.
As I work my way through these I will add to this post with some summaries.
Colorado county leaders blast state officials over mental health, claim 69 foster kids are missing
The state system that treats children with severe mental health issues is so stretched that it’s become dangerous, Colorado’s county human services directors charged in a fiery letter to state officials.
Previous efforts have failed to “shift the course of the emergency,” wrote the leaders of the Colorado Human Services Directors Association and Colorado Counties Inc. in a joint letter obtained by The Colorado Sun and 9News.
Child protection caseworkers are sometimes spending the night with children in hotels or county office buildings because they cannot find a bed for them at a treatment center. Caseworkers responsible for keeping kids safe spend hours and days on the phone attempting to locate an available bed, according to the letter, which was addressed to the executive directors of the Colorado Department of Human Services and the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing.
It is important that you call out every single state employee that abuses their power, is negligent in their duties, falsifies documents, or commits fraud.
For the Department of Children’s Services, also look at APP (policy) which reads:
DCS Policy 1.16 states as follows:
REQUESTING AN INVESTIGATION: A citizen, employee, supervisor or manager, foster parent, provider, or child in DCS custody may request an IA investigation. Such a request may be submitted by any means of communication (in person, by telephone, letter, e-mail, etc.) to the IA Director or by contacting an IA Regional Supervisor (RS).
The content of the form will look like this:
INTERNAL AFFAIRS REFERRAL
The purpose of this form is to report alleged violation(s) or suspected violation of any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation or breach of State of Tennessee and/or DCS policy committed by a DCS employee, agent or independent contractor.
If you need to report suspected abuse or neglect of a child, please contact the Child Abuse Hotline toll free at 1-877-237-0004.
Examples of what we will investigate:
Breach of Confidentiality
Destruction of State Property
Excessive Force
Falsification of an Official Document
Fraud/Embezzlement
Harassment that does not meet criteria for Office of Civil Rights Investigation (example: abusive conduct/bullying)
Loss of State Property due to carelessness or negligence
Medication Errors
Misuse of Authority/Position
Misuse of State Property
Acts or Threats of Workplace Violence
Negligence in the performance of duties
Possession/Distribution of Contraband by Employee(s)
Assault or Misconduct not investigated by Law Enforcement
Allegations of malfeasance, misfeasance, nonfeasance and violations of rules, policies and procedures concerning the management and operations of the department.
Note: Additional allegations (not included in the previous list) may also require an IA investigation.
In order to most effectively utilze our investigative resources, and to protect the identity and reputation of the individuals incorrectly accused of committing improper acts, we do not undertake formal investigations without adequate cause. Evidence to corroborate your allegation such as documents, witnesses, and other specific and relevant information assists in determining whether there is adequate cause to warrant an investigation.
Please provide the following information:Please provide the alleged or suspected violator(s) Region and Division or YDC.Please provide the First and Last name(s) and job title(s), if applicaple for all parties involved.Please provide a detailed explanaton, to include who, what, when, where, how and the nature of the alleged or suspected violation(s).Date of when the incident/violation occurred.Please explain how you were made aware of the incident/violation.If you reported your concern to a supervisory official or any other department or agency please list them here.Please provide the First and Last Name(s) and job title(s) of any person (witnesses, fellow employees, supervisors, etc.) who may have additional information to support the alleged or suspected violation. Please include what information each person can provide.Please upload any (and all) documentation to support your claim below. No File Chosen
The information you provide in this notification is considered confidential under Tennessee Code Annotated Section 8-4-407. However, we cannot guarantee anonymity or complete confidentiality if the Tennessee Department of Children’s Services has a separate legal obligation to cooperate in subsequent criminal, civil, or administrative legal proceedings related to the allegation(s) or complaint(s). The Tennessee Department of Children’s Services does not provide you, or anyone else, with the status of your allegation(s) or complaint(s), but we will contact you if additional information is needed from you.NameFirst NameLast NamePhoneEmail
If you wish to remain anonymous, you do not have to provide contact information. However, we encourage you to provide your contact information in the event additional questions arise during the investigation process.
MAKE YOURSELF SOME NOTES BEFORE YOU BEGIN / BE CONCISE AND BE READY TO SHARE DOCUMENTS
Shared from other researchers. Do with it what you will. 👇👇👇
Too Deep For Sheeple è su Facebook. Per connetterti con Too Deep For Sheeple, iscriviti subito a Facebook. Iscriviti o Accedi Too Deep For Sheeple 30 giugno 2020 alle ore 07:36 · The History of NESARA. History and true story National Economic Security and Reformation Act(NESARA) This change began in the mid 1970’s, when the Federal Land Bank illegally foreclosed on farmers mortgages all throughout the Midwest. In each of these cases the farmers were defrauded by the banks with the approval of theFederal Reserve System. These court cases would eventually become known as the farmer claims program. In 1978 an elderly ranch farmer in Colorado purchased a farm with loan from theFederal Land Bank; after he died the property was passed on to his son Roy Schwasinger Jr. who was a retired military general. Soon after a Federal Land Bank officer and Federal Marshall appeared on his property and informed him the bank was foreclosing on his farm and to vacate within 30 days. Without his knowledge, his deceased father signed a stipulation which reverted the property back to the Federal Land Bank in the event of the borrower’s death. Outraged, Roy Schwasinger filed a class action lawsuit in the Denver Federal Court system. But the case didn’t go very far and the suit was dismissed from filing incorrectly. This began Roy Schwasinger’s investigation into the inner workings of the banking system. In 1982 he was given a contract by the US senate and later Supreme Court to investigate banking fraud. But because he was under a strict non-disclosure order he was not allowed to tell the media what he discovered. In the late 80s he began sharing his knowledge with others including high ranking military personnel who helped him bring about a class action lawsuit against the federal government. The first series of these lawsuits began in the mid 1980’s when William and Shirley Baskerville of Fort Collins, Colorado were involved in a bankruptcy case with First Interstate Bank of Fort Collins; who was trying to foreclose on their farm. At a restaurant their lawyer informed them that he would no longer be able to help them and walked-off. Overhearing the conversation Roy Schwasinger offered his advice on how to appeal the case in bankruptcy court. So in 1987 they filed an appeal (Case No. 87-C-716) with the United States District Court in Colorado. On November 3, 1988, the Denver Federal Court system ruled that indeed the banks had defrauded the Baskervilles and proceeded to reverse its bankruptcy decision. But when the foreclosed property was not returned they filed a new lawsuit. Eventually, 23 other farmers, ranchers, and Indians swindled by the banks in the same manner would join in the case. In these cases, the banks were foreclosing on the properties using fraudulent methods such as charging exorbitant interest, illegal foreclosure, or by not crediting mortgage payments to their account as they should have but instead would steal the mortgage payments for themselves triggering foreclosure on the property.
After running out of money they continued their fight without the help of lawyers. With some assistance by the Farmers Union a new lawsuit was filed against theFederal Land Bank and the Farmers Credit System. (1) Case No. 92-C-1781 TheDistrict Court ruled in their favor and ordered the banks to return the stolen properties with help from either Federal Marshals or the National Guard. But when no payments were made, the farmers declared involuntary Chapter Seven Bankruptcy against the Federal Land Bank and the Farmers Credit System. The banks appealed their case insisting they were not a business but a federal agency therefore they were not liable to pay the damages. So the farmer’s legal team adopted a new strategy. According to the Federal Land Bank’s 1933 charter they are not allowed to make loans directly to applicants, but instead could only back loans as a guarantor in case of default. Because the Federal Land Bank had violated this rule the farmer’s legal team was able to successfully sue the bank for damages. Word of the lawsuit began to spread; the legal team would teach others how to fight foreclosure and to help them file lawsuits as well (Case No. 93-1308-M). Celebrities such as Willie Nelson joined in the cause and helped raise money during his “Farm Aid” concerts. Here is short clip of Willie Nelson describing in his own words the series of events leading up to the farmer claims legal case…… The Baskerville case had now become the Farmer Claims Class Action Lawsuit. Worried about the legal ramifications the government retaliated against the farmers by hitting them with either outrageous IRS fees, or by imprisoning the legal teamunder frivolous non-related charges. When the farmers realized they were being unfairly targeted, they had military generals such as General Roy Schwasinger sit in the courtroom to make sure the bribed judges would vote according to constitutional law. The farmers now with a large team of knowledgeable people of the law behind them filed a new case to claim additional damages from the fraudulent loaning activities of the Farmers Credit System. losing the appeals as well. More and more evidence was collected. According to the National Banking Act all banks are required to register their charters with theFederal and State Bureau of Records, but none of the banks complied, allowing the legal team to sue the Farmers Credit System. Not only was Farmers Credit System not chartered to do business with the American Banking Association, but so were other quasi government organizations such as the Federal Housing Administration, The Department of Housing and Urban Development, and even the FederalReserve Bank. The Farmers Claims lawsuit was thrown out of court at each level with the records purposely destroyed. So in the early 1990’s Roy Schwasinger brought the case before the United States Supreme Court. Some of the content of this case is sealed from public eyes but most of it can be viewed today. Almost (u-nan-ah-mous-ly) unanimously the U.S. Supreme Court Justices ruled that the Farmers Union claims were indeed VALID, therefore, all property foreclosed by the Farmers CreditSystem was illegal and all those who were foreclosed on would have to receive damages. In addition, they ruled that the U.S. federal government and banks had defrauded the farmers, and all U.S. citizens, out of vast sums of money and property. Furthermore, the court ruled the shocking truth that the IRS was a Puerto Rican Trust and that the Federal Reserve was unlawful, that the income tax amendment was only ratified by four states and therefore was not a legal amendment, that theIRS code was not enacted into “Positive Law”* within the Code of Federal Regulations, and how the U.S. government illegally foreclosed on farmer’s homes with help from federal agencies. *Positive Law Laws that have been enacted by a properly instituted and recognized branch of the government. Irrefutable proof was presented by a retired CIA agent. He provided testimony and records of the banks illegal activities, to lead further evidence that the Farmers’ Union claims were indeed legitimate. The implications of such a decision were profound. All gold, silver, and property titles, taken by
the Federal Reserve and IRS must be returned to the people. Th legal team sought assistance from a small group of benevolent visionaries, consisting of politicians, military generals, and business people who have been secretly working to restore the constitution since the mid 1950’s. Somehow within their ranks, a four star U.S. army general received “title” and “receiver” of the original 1933 United States Bankruptcy. When the case was brought before the U.S. Supreme Court, they ruled in his favor, giving the Army General title over theUnited States, Inc. Legal action was then passed on to the Senate FinanceCommittee and Senator Sam Nunn, who was working with Roy Schwasinger. With the help of covert congressional and political pressure, President George H.W. Bush issued an Executive Order (a) on Oct. 23, 1991, which provided a provision allowing anyone who has a claim against the Federal Government to receive payment as long as it’s within the rules of the original format of the case. (a) Executive Order No. 12778 Principles of Ethical Conduct for Government Officers and Employees; October 23, 1991 According to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, all present and succeeding debts against the U.S. Treasury must be assumed by theFederal Reserve. Thus the farmer’s claims legal team was able to use that executive order to not only force the Federal Reserve to pay out damages in a gold backed currency but also allow them to receive legal ownership over the bankruptcy of United States, Inc. To collect damages the farmers legal team used an obscure attachment to the 14th Amendment of the Constitution which most people are not aware of. After the Civil War the government allowed citizens to claim a payment on anyone who suffered damages as a result of the Federal Government failing to protect its citizens from harm or damages by a foreign government. President Grant had this attachment sealed from public eyes but somehow, someone the farmer’s legal team got a hold of it. If you listened to that carefully, it specifies damages by a foreign government. That foreign government is the corporate federal government which has been masquerading to the public as the constitutional government. Remember this goes back to the Organic Act of 1871 and the Trading with the Enemies Act of 1933, which defined all citizens as enemy combatants under the Federal system known as the United States. The Justices and farmer’s legal team recognized how evil and corrupt our Federal government had become and to counteract this they added some provisions in the settlement to bring the government back under control. a. First they would have to be paid using a lawful currency, backed by gold and silver as the constitution dictates. This would eliminate inflation and gyrating economic cycles created by the Federal Reserve System. b. Second they would be required to go back to common law instead of Admiralty Law under the gold fringe flags. Under common law if there is no damage or harm done then there is no violation of the law. This would eliminate millions of laws which are used to control the masses and protect corrupt politicians. c. Lastly the IRS would have to be dismantled and replaced with a national sales tax. This is the basis of the NESARA Law. When the legal team finally settled on a figure, each individual would receive an average of $20 million dollars payout per claim. Multiplied by a total of 336,000 claims that were filed against the U.S. Federal Government, the total payout would come out to a staggering $6.6 trillion dollars. The U.S. Supreme Court placed a gag order on the case, struck all information from the Federal Registry, and placed all records in the Supreme Court files. Up to that point Senator Sam Nunn had kept the Baskerville Case records within his office. A settlement was agreed to out of court and the decision was sealed by Janet Reno. Because the case was sealed, claimants are not allowed to share court documents to media outlets without violating the settlement, but they can still tel others about the lawsuit. This is why you probably have not heard about this. In 1991 Roy Schwasinger went before a senate committee to present evidence of the banks and governments criminal activity. He informed them how the Corporation of the United States was tied to the establishment of a New World Order which would bring about a fascist one world government ruled by the international bankers. So in 1992 a task force was put together consisting of over 300 retired and 35 active US military officers who strongly supported
constitutional law.* This task force was responsible for investigating governmental officials, congressional officers, judges, and the Federal Reserve. *Chief of Naval Operations, AdmiralJeremy Boorda *General David McCloud *Former Director of CentralIntelligence, William Colby They uncovered the common practice of bribery and extortion committed by both senators and judges. The criminal activity was so rampant that only 2 out of 535 members of congress were deemed honest. But more importantly they carried out the first ever audit of the Federal Reserve. TheFederal Reserve was used to giving orders to politicians and had no intentions of being audited. However after they were informed their offices would be raided under military gunpoint if necessary; they complied with the investigation. After reviewing their files the military officers found $800 trillion dollars sitting in accounts which should have been applied to the national debt. And contrary to federal government propaganda they also discovered that most nations had in factowed money to the United States instead of the other way around. These hidden trillions were then confiscated and placed into European bank accounts in order to generate the enormous funds needed to pay the farmers claims class action lawsuit, later this money would become the basis of the prosperity programs. Despite these death blows President George H.W. Bush and the illuminati continued on with their plans of global enslavement. In August 1992 the military officers confronted President Bush and demanded he sign agreement that he would return the United States to constitutional law and ordered him to never use the term New World Order again. Bush pretended to cooperate but secretly planned to bring about the New World Order anyway by signing an Executive Order on December 25, 1992, that would have indefinitely closed all banks giving Bush an excuse to declare martial law. Under the chaos of martial law, Bush intended to install a new constitution which would have kept everyone currently in office in their same position for 25 years and it would have removed all rights to elect new officials. The military intervened and stopped Bush from signing that Executive order. In 1993 members of theSupreme Court, certain members of congress and representatives from the Clinton government meet with high ranking US military officers who were demanding a return to constitutional law, reforms of the banking system, and financial redress. They agreed to create the farm claims process which would allow the legal team to set up meetings all over the country on a grass roots level to help others file claims and to educate them about the lawsuit. A claim of harm could be made on any loan issued by a financial institution for all interest paid; foreclosures; attorney and court fees; IRS taxes or liens; real estate and property taxes; mental and emotional stress caused by the loss of property; stress related illness such as suicide and divorce; and even warrants, incarceration, and probation could also be claimed. But the Clinton government undermined their efforts by requiring the farm claims to use a specific form designed by the government. This form imposed an administrative fee of $300 for each claim, which was later used in 1994 as a basis to arrest the leaders of the legal team including Roy Schwasinger. The government was so afraid of what they would say during their trial in Michigan that extra steps were taken to conceal the true nature of the case. County courthouse employees were not allowed to work between Monday and Thursday during the course of the trial. And outside the courthouse, FBI agents swarmed the perimeter preventing the media and visitors from learning what was going on as well. Harassment and retaliation by the government increased, many where sent prison or murdered while incarcerated. Despite being protected by his military personnel the army general who acquired the original 1933 Title of Bankruptcy of the United States; was imprisoned, killed, and replaced with a clone. This clone was then used as a decoy to prevent any further claims from being filed. During the first Clinton administration the military delayed many of Clinton’s Federal appointments until they were sure these individuals would help restore constitutional law. One such individual who promised to bring about the necessary changes was Attorney General Janet Reno. In agreement with the Supreme Court ruling on June 3, 1993, Janet Reno ordered the Delta Force and Navy Seals to Switzerland, England, and Israel to recapture trillions of dollars of gold stolen by the Federal Reserve System from the strategic gold reserves. These nations cooperated with the raid because they were promised their debts owed to theUnited States would be canceled and because the people who stole the money from the United States also stole money from their nations as well. This bullion is to be used for the new currency backed by precious metals. It’s now safely stockpiled at the NORAD Complex at Colorado Springs, Colorado and four other repositories. Janet Reno’s action so enraged the powers-that-be, that it resulted in her death. She was then replaced with a clone and it was this creature that was responsible for covering-up the various Clinton scandals.
To keep the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury Robert Rubin in line, he too was also cloned. For the remainder of their term in office both Reno and Rubin received their salaries from the International Monetary Fund as foreign agents and not from the U.S. Treasury. Despite these actions the legal team continued on with their fight while managing to avoid bloodshed and a major revolution. After 1993 the farmer claims process name was changed to Bank Claims. Between 1993 and 1996, the U.S. Supreme Court required U.S. citizens to file “Bank Claims” to collect damages paid by the U.S. Treasury Department. This process CLOSED in 1996. During this time the U.S. Supreme Court assigned one or more Justices to monitor the progress of the rulings. They enlisted help of experts in economics, monetary systems, banking, constitutional government and law, and many other related areas. These justices built coalitions of support and assistance with thousands of people worldwide; known as ‘White Knights”. The term ‘White Knights’ was borrowed from the world of big business. It refers to a vulnerable company that is rescued by a corporation or a wealthy person from a hostile takeover. To implement the required changes, the five Justices spent years negotiating how the reformTaotionDseweopulFdorccSuhr.eEevpelnetuèalslyutFheaycesebtotleodk.onPecrertain agreements, also known as ‘Accords’, with the U.S. government, the Federal Reserve Bank owners, the International Monetary Fund, the connetterti con Too Deep For Sheeple, iscriviti World Bank, and with numerous other countries including the United Kingdom and countries of subito a Facebook. the Euro Zone. Because these U.S. banking reformations will impact the entire world; the IMF, World Bank, and other countries had to be involved. The reformations require that theFederal Iscriviti Reserve be absorbed by the U.S. Treasury Department and the banks’ fraudulent activities must o that the US Supreme Court justices had no intentions of implementing the ‘Accords.’ So they decided the only way to implement there formations was through a law passed by congress. In 1999 a 75 page documentknown as the National Economic Security and Reformation Act (NESARA) was submitted to congress where it sat with little action for almost a year. Late one evening on March 9, 2000, a written quorum call was hand-delivered by DeltaForce and Navy SEALs to 15 members of the US Senate and the US House who were sponsors and co-sponsors of NESARA. They were immediately escorted by the Delta Force and Navy SEALs to their respective voting chambers where they passed the National Economic Security and Reformation Act. These 15 members of congress were the only people lawfully allowed to hold office in accordance with the original 13th amendment. Remember British soldiers destroyed copies of the Titles of Nobility Amendment (TONA) in the war of 1812 because it prevented anyone who had ties to the crown of England from holding public office. NESARA is the most ground breaking reformation to sweep not only this country but our planet in its entire history. The act does away with the Federal Reserve Bank, the IRS, the shadow government, and much more. be stopped and payment must be made for past harm. In 1998, the military generals who originally participated in the farmer’s claim process realized Accedi
NESARA implements the following changes: 1. Zeros out all credit card, mortgage, and other bank debt due to illegal banking and government activities. This is the Federal Reserve’s worst nightmare:
a “jubilee” or a forgiveness of debt. 2. Abolishes the income tax
Abolishes the IRS. Employees of the IRS will be transferred into the USTreasury national sales tax area.
Creates a 14% flat rate non-essential ‘new items only’ sales tax revenue for thegovernment. In other words food and medicine will not be taxed; nor will used items such as old homes.
Increases benefits to senior citizens 6. Returns Constitutional Law to all courts and legal matters.
Reinstates the original Title of Nobility amendment. Hundreds of thousands of Americans under the control of foreign powers will lose their citizenship, bedeported to other countries, and barred from reentry for the remainder of their life. And millions of people will soon discover their college degrees are now worthless paper.
Establishes new Presidential and Congressional elections within 120 days after NESARA’s announcement. The interim government will cancel all “National Emergencies” and return us back to constitutional law.
Monitors elections and prevents illegal election activities of special interest groups. 10. Creates a new U.S. Treasury, ‘rainbow currency,’ backed by gold, silver, and platinum precious metals, ending the bankruptcy of the United States initiated by Franklin Roosevelt in 1933.
Forbids the sale of American birth certificate records as chattel property bondsby the US Department of Transportation.
Initiates new U.S. Treasury Bank System in alignment with Constitutional Law
Eliminates the Federal Reserve System. During the transition period theFederal Reserve will be allowed to operate side by side of the U.S. treasury for oneyear in order to remove all Federal Reserve notes from the money supply.
Restores financial privacy
Retrains all judges and attorneys in Constitutional Law
Ceases all aggressive, U.S. government military actions worldwide 17. Establishes peace throughout the world
Releases enormous sums of money for humanitarian purposes
And so it goes that the losers, shameless, half wits of the world 🌎 wander through the planet writing words of destruction without ever investigating the truth. So it goes.
It just means I need to keep sharing the deep dark corners behind those manipulating the outcomes. Here is the article published in the “Brentwood Times” intended to distort the truth and the fact Dede Miller lied under oath when she traveled across county lines to get Judge Michael Collins to enter an ex parte order to remove an innocent 12 year old child from her mother. Yes Deandra Miller, you lied.
After four phone calls to Dede and other DCS employees and to Detective James Cornelius to tell them we would cooperate with an investigation, Dede lied and said Mother failed to cooperate and not a word about her having an attorney.
This is what the article said:
Makes you wonder a few things. When did a public courtroom turn into “court watchers” and “distractors”?
When does the press start caring about the truth?
Just remember we have miles to go before we sleep 💤.
Connie Reguli shared this article from Politico. This shows that we are sitting in a dangerous precipice. On the other side of where we are is a nation where your children are removed from you at birth to be raised by the state. Please help us fight for our liberties. Join Family Forward Project on Facebook and follow me on YouTube.
When it comes to society’s interest in protecting children, the legal precedent is unambiguous: The rights of their parents come second. Parents do have the freedom to direct the health care and education of their children, but these rights are not unlimited. As the Supreme Court said in Prince v. Massachusetts, parents are not free “to make martyrs of their children” by putting them in harm’s way. Governments can and do limit parents’ discretion with the goal of protecting the health, safety and welfare of children. One example is child car seat requirements, which exist in all 50 states. Every state also has a law authorizing the government to intervene when parents abuse or neglect their children.
All 50 states also have the power to limit parental discretion to protect other children. For instance, schools and day care facilities are heavily regulated by local, state and federal laws to make sure that they are safe. Children who attend school are required to be immunized in all 50 states. These requirements have been upheld by numerous courts, including the Supreme Court. Schools also prohibit parents from sending children to school when they are sick, and a federal appeals court held that unimmunized children could be excluded from school during “an outbreak of a vaccine-preventable disease.” Given these legal precedents, it is clear that schools and day care facilities can require masks as a condition of attendance.
Loss of First Amendment Freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury. Though First Amendment rights are not absolute, they may be curtailed only by interests of vital importance, the burden of proving which rests on the government. Elrod v. Burns, 96 S.Ct. 2673; 427 U.S. 347, (1976).
The United States Supreme Court noted that a parent’s right to “the companionship, care, custody and management of his or her children” is an interest “far more precious” than any property right. May v. Anderson, 345 U.S. 528, 533; 73 S.Ct. 840, 843, (1952).
The Court (U.S. Supreme Court) stressed, “the parent-child relationship is an important interest that undeniably warrants deference and, absent a powerful countervailing interest, protection.” A parent’s interest in the companionship, care, custody and management of his or her children rises to a constitutionally secured right, given the centrality of family life as the focus for personal meaning and responsibility. Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651; 92 S.Ct. 1208, (1972)
The U.S. Supreme Court implied that “a (once) married father who is separated or divorced from a mother and is no longer living with his child” could not constitutionally be treated differently from a currently married father living with his child. Quilloin v. Walcott, 98 S.Ct. 549; 434 U.S. 246, 255-56, (1978)
Law and court procedures that are “fair on their faces” but administered “with an evil eye or a heavy hand” was discriminatory and violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, (1886)
The Constitution also protects “the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters.” Federal Courts (and State Courts), under Griswold can protect, under the “life, liberty and pursuit of happiness” phrase of the Declaration of Independence, the right of a man to enjoy the mutual care, company, love and affection of his children, and this cannot be taken away from him without due process of law. There is a family right to privacy which the state cannot invade or it becomes actionable for civil rights damages. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, (1965)
Parent’s right to custody of child is a right encompassed within protection of this amendment which may not be interfered with under guise of protection public interest by legislative action which is arbitrary or without reasonable relation to some purpose within competency of state to effect. Reynold v. Baby Fold, Inc., 369 NE 2d 858; 68 Ill 2d 419, appeal dismissed 98 S.Ct. 1598, 435 U.S. 963, Il, (1977)
Parent’s rights have been recognized as being “essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free man.” Meyer v. Nebraska, 92 S.Ct. 1208, (1972)
Reality of private biases and possible injury they might inflict were impermissible considerations under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Palmore v. Sidoti, 104 S.Ct. 1879; 466 U.S. 429
Legislative classifications which distributes benefits and burdens on the basis of gender carry the inherent risk of reinforcing stereotypes about the proper place of women and their need for special protection; thus, even statutes purportedly designed to compensate for and ameliorate the effects of past discrimination against women must be carefully tailored… the state cannot be permitted to classify on the basis of sex. Orr v. Orr, 99 S.Ct. 1102; 4340 U.S. 268 (1979)
The United States Supreme Court held that the “old notion” that “generally it is the man’s primary responsibility to provide a home and its essentials” can no longer justify a statute that discriminates on the basis of sex. No longer is the female destined solely for the homes and the rearing of the family, and only the male for the marketplace and the world of ideas. Stanton v. Stanton, 421 U.S. 7, 10; 95 S.Ct. 1373, 1376 (1975)
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that severance in the parent-child relationship caused by the state occur only with rigorous protections for individual liberty interests at stake. Bell v. City of Milwaukee, 746 F 2d 1205: U.S. Ct. App. 7th Cir. WI., (1984)
COMPELLING STATE INTEREST The following Supreme Court decisions were cited in a published opinion by Chief judge Norman K. Moon of Court of Appeals of Virginia June 3, 1997 in the case Williams and Williams v. Williams and Williams 24 Va. App. 778; 485 S.E. 2d 651 (June 3, 1997)
Even when blood relationships are strained, parents retain vital interest in preventing irretrievable destruction of their family life; if anything, persons faced with forced dissolution of their parental rights have more critical need for procedural protections than do those resisting state intervention into ongoing family affairs. The Supreme Court noted its “historical recognition that freedom of personal choice in matters of family life is a fundamental liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.” Santosky v. Kramer, 102 S.Ct. 1388; 455 U.S. 745, (1982).
In applying the protection of the Fourteenth Amendment, the United States Supreme Court has held that “[w]here certain fundamental rights are involved… regulation limiting these rights may be justified only by a ‘compelling state interest’ …and …legislative enactments must be narrowly drawn to express only the legitimate state interests at stake. State interference with a fundamental right must by justified by a “compelling state interest.” Roe v. Wade. 410 U.S. 113, 155 ; 93 S.Ct. 705; 35 L Ed 2d 147, (1973)
State’s power to legislate, adjudicate and administer all aspects of family law, including determinations of custodial and visitation rights, is subject to scrutiny by federal judiciary within reach of due process and/or equal protection clause of 14th Amendment… fourteenth Amendment applied to states through specific rights contained in the first eight amendments of the Constitution which declares fundamental personal rights… Fourteenth Amendment encompasses and applied to states those pre-existing fundamental rights recognized by the Ninth Amendment. The Ninth Amendment acknowledged the prior existence of fundamental rights with it: ” The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. “The United States Supreme Court in a long line of decisions, has recognized that matters involving marriage, procreation, and the parent-child relationship are among those fundamental “liberty” interests protected by the Constitution. Thus, the decision in Roe v. Wade, as recently described by the Supreme Court as founded on the “Constitutional underpinning of… a recognition that the “liberty” protected by the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment includes not only the freedoms explicitly mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but also a freedom of personal choice in certain matters of marriage and family life.”
While this court has not attempted to define with exactness the liberty thus guaranteed [by the Fourteenth Amendment] … Without doubt, it denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men. Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923).
In addition to recognizing as a fundamental liberty interest the right of parents to raise their children, the Supreme Court has also established that the Constitution’s guarantee to fundamental privacy rights also embodies a fundamental right to parental autonomy in child rearing. The Court acknowledged a “private realm of family life which the state cannot enter.” Prince v. Massachusetts, 3210 U.S. 158, 166 (1944); Moore v. City of East Cleveland, 431-U.S. 494 (1977)
The Supreme Court has clearly established that to constitute a compelling interest, state interference with a parent’s right to raise his or her child must be for the purpose of protecting the child’s health or welfare. Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 230 (1972)
Father enjoys the right to associate with his children which is guaranteed by this amendment (First) as incorporated in Amendment 14, or which is embodied in the concept of “liberty” as that word is used in the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment and Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Mabra v. Schmidt, 356 F Supp 620: D.C., WI (1973)
SUPPORTING FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT DECISIONS The rights of parents to care, custody and nurture of their children is of such character that it cannot be denied without violating those fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political institutions, and such right is a fundamental right protected by this amendment (First) and Amendments 5, 9, and 14. Doe v. Irwin , 440 F Supp 1247; U.S.D.C. of Michigan, (1985)
Parent’s interest in custody of her children is a liberty interest which has received considerable constitutional protection; a parent who is deprived of custody of his or her child, even though temporarily, suffers thereby grievous loss and such loss deserves extensive due process protection. In the Interest of Cooper, 621 P 2d 437: 5 Kansas App Div 2d 584, (1980)
A parent’s right to the preservation of his relationship with his child derives from the fact that the parent’s achievement of a rich and rewarding life is likely to depend significantly on his ability to participate in the rearing of his children. A child’s corresponding right to protection from interference in the relationship derives from the psychic importance to him of being raised by a loving, responsible, reliable adult. Franz v. U.S., 707 F 2d 582, 58-95-599; U.S. Ct. App. (1983)
The liberty interest of the family encompasses an interest in retaining custody of one’s children and, thus a state may not interfere with a parent’s custodial rights absent due process protections. Langton v. Maloney, 527 F Supp 538, D.C. Conn. (1981)
A parent’s right to the custody of his or parent’s right to the custody of his or her children is an element of “liberty” guaranteed by the 5th Amendment and the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. Matter of Gentry, 369 NW 2d 889, MI App. Div. (1983)
The parent-child relationship is a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. Bell v. City of Milwaukee, 746 F 2d 1205, 1242-45; U.S. Ct. App 7th Cir. WI.
No bond is more precious and non should be more zealously protected by the law as the bond between parent and child. Carson v. Elrod, 411 F Supp 645, 649; DC E.D. VA (1976)
The rights of parents to parent-child relationships are recognized and upheld. Fantony v. Fantony, 122 A 2d 593, (1956); Brennan v. Brennan, 454 A 2d 901, (1982)
Radical Tennessee - Radically Accountable and Radically Free 