Philadelphia steps up with report on excessive removals of children by child protective services.

By Connie Reguli

May 2022

I watched the very first video posted by city commissioner David Oh from Philadelphia. He was shocked and distressed over what he heard. That was 2017. I, however, I was already well trenched in the whole dark world of child protective services.

The stories are the same. The state social workers lie in reports, they get secret ex parte orders, they refuse to follow their own policies, they refuse relative placement, they flip case work deed multiple times cause if more delay, they refuse to turn over records, and they constantly tell state legislators that they don’t have brought money.

The final report for Philadelphia is here.

But let’s review.

The Philadelphia special commission found that in 2017, the City of Philly removed more children per capita than any major city in the US. Three times more that New York and four times more than Chicago. The commission was set with the task to determine why. The committee divided itself into subcommittees on the following topics: policy and procedure and DHS and family court. Through case studies, public forums, surveys, and a diverse committee membership, they made several recommendations.

Now is the time for me to say that I agree wholeheartedly with their recommendations and I have set forth the very same recommendations for years. That’s okay though. I am one person, one voice, one attorney, one advocate, and one lobbyist. I am excited and encouraged that the rumble for reform has risen to the next tier. Here are how their ideas shook out:

On Policy and Procedure: The commission found faulty reporting and wrongful removals. This was due to several issues. Poverty is interpreted as neglect. Neglect has no standard definition. Children who could remain in their home with support were removed. Record keeping and reports were faulty. Children who were witnesses to domestic violence in the home were removed which caused more trauma for the child and hindered the reporting of domestic violence. Mandating reporting removes the reasonable discretion of professionals. Families were not provided adequate notice of their constitutional rights including Miranda rights against self-incrimination. Siblings were confiscated at birth when a parent had a history with the system without an assessment of the ability of the parent. Minorities were being disproportionately impacted. And centralized registries were being used without due process.

On DHA and Family Court: Parents were not adequately represented once they entered the system. Children’s true interest and constitutional rights were not being represented. Family court systems were closed and secretive. Cases would linger in the system without resolution.

Some of the recommendations ring a familiar tone and must be applied broadly across the United States:

The list boils down to something like this:

  • The Courts should be open for public viewing. This helps to provide citizen and press oversight. The purveyors and can be given restrictions on the names and identify of the children and parents could move the court to close the proceeding.
  • All social workers must wear body cams and record all interviews and meetings.
  • All cases must be completed on a timely basis.
  • Child representation needs to follow the model of the ABA (American Bar Association) and not the historic “best interest” model.
  • Parents need quality representation and a multidisciplinary approach to resolving their involvement with CPS.
  • Families need to have effective counsel earlier in the process. The commission found that waiting until the parents were already facing litigation was too late. They needed earlier representation and an early Miranda warning.
  • That the refusal to cooperate with CPS alone should never be a reason for removal of a child.
  • That neglect needed a clearer definition and should not be a reason for removal unless there was sufficient evidence to show harm to the child. Most of the neglect cases in Philly were poverty related. The commission declared that poverty in and of itself was never a cause for removal.
  • The determinations of capacity and fitness to parent needed to consist of independent assessments.
  • Mandatory reporting needed to end.

So here were are again. Two thousand twenty-years B.C. in the United States of America and we are at the same precipice that we have been at for the last ten years at least. Those who have worked in the area of child welfare consistently since 2002 have seen the effects of a incompetent and grossly powerful agency

I look forward to seeing how Philly does this and will be reaching out to these lawmakers and leaders to more support. Thank you David Oh and Richard Wexler for being brave warriors in this battle.

My short form consult is found here

Connie Reguli.

The Systemic Failure of the Family Court Process

By Connie Reguli – Cancelled by the Establishment – Invested in Your Well-being. May 27, 2022.

Connie Reguli (right) woth amazing advocate Lauren from Maine. In Washington DC

I would say I operated different than most attorneys in family law … I cared what happened, I was concerned about children in Courtrooms, I advised my clients on the risk of being too emotional and on being unemotional, and at the end of the day I wanted what was ‘best for the children’. However, it is an oxymoron to speak about the best interests of the child in the adversarial family court realm.

I hear so many people say…my lawyer would not defend me…my lawyer would not put on my evidence…my lawyer did not care…my lawyer did nothing. I am not here to defend lackluster representation, but I am here to say blaming lawyer is not the solution. A recent United States Supreme Court decision, Shinn v Ramirez, the Supreme Court said yes it is the luck of the draw that you had not just one but two crappy attorneys, you cannot do a habeus corpus petition on ineffective assistance of counsel. Done ✅.

However, that is not the end of the story. Attorneys also have to work with the lump of clay called your life that you give them. In the context of family and parent-child relationships depending on the “right” attorney to make it right is an ad hominem argument.

From a lawyers view…people come to us with a mess that evolved out of the imperfections in our clients lives. They end up in the imperfect court system. Which is adversarial by design. It’s a war zone. The biggest weapons, and sometimes the best told lie wins. Lawyers only have so many tools and none of them are meant to resolve anything. Only possible result is win or lose. We can’t undo the clients history so it’s the best spin. And then of course it’s about money. Lawyers have so many expenses and so much risk that the costs are driven up. Part of the court game it wearing out the other side, emotionally or financially. They are paid to “do a job” they are paid to engage in a battlefield.

And clients are ill prepared. They don’t understand the system and judge have no patience for stumbling memories. Cross examination is intended to trip you up so a judge can call you a liar – they will use the judicial vernacular “lacks credibility” but all the same – they call you a liar. And in the world of court – the judge has the final say as to whether or not you are a liar.

I have to get you to turn your heads directly into this perverted and demonic snare.

The best I can I will help you resolve, negotiate, and move past the chaos or unfold the mysteries of litigation. If you rely on a fair and impartial judge who will render a decision on the best interest of your child you are waking blindly in a minefield.

I also intend to train an army of advocates to help.

You can contact me to consult on these issues. God bless.

Click on short form consult request.

Connie Reguli

This is the most important election in the country.

fb.watch/cLvbt4zXxq/